

January 25, 2023 at 7:34 amFAQParticipant
What is Missing mass method? The details are in the Theory Reference, but a short description of this approach is that we input the ZPA (Zero Period Acceleration), and the thought is that if the structure acts ‘rigidly’, we don’t see amplification at/above that frequency – if we input an acceleration “A” at the base at such high frequencies, then the response at other points should be “A” as well. The value we input into Workbench Mechanical is this acceleration value “A” – the Mechanical solver knows our total mass [M] and the effective mass based on the number of modes we extract [M’]. If we have this assumption that, at high frequencies, the input/output ratio is close to 1, then the ‘missing mass’ is based on the difference between [M] and [M’]. There is a force {F} associated with the acceleration A times the missing mass ([M] – [M’]), and we can get this response {R} as [K]^1{F}. Think of this like an extra mode shape (although it’s not a mode – it’s a pseudostatic response component) that we then add in the mode combination phase. All of this is described in a more mathematically rigorous method in Theory Reference Equations 15226 through 15232 with the mode combination in Equation 15233. Basically, if we included enough modes (e.g., effective modal mass very close to actual mass), we don’t need this method. However, if we don’t extract/include enough modes and we assume those missing modes are highfrequency response, then the Missing Mass effect tries to include the effect of these modes in an additional pseduostatic mode shape. When to use missing mass method? To address whether Missing mass response is needed the user needs to answer this question: Did I solve enough modes, or are the truncated modes not accurately capturing the mass of the system? A major cause of error in response spectrum analyses is not using sufficient modes to correctly capture the mass. Ideally, you want to compute enough modes to have a high percentage of effective mass, but in some cases, but this may be impractical (resource consuming), especially if the excitation spectrum is a much lower range. One can check the mass captured in the modal analysis, by looking at the cumulative mass fraction in the same direction of excitation as the response spectrum analysis. For example, let’s say that the user extracted 200 modes and the participation factor table in the modal analysis shows that these 200 modes captured 75% of the total mass. If the frequency range the user wants is more than adequately covered by the modes extracted, then the user may not wish to solve for 400 modes (these cases are often associated with a lot of mass at constrained supports (i.e., bulky constrained base) since to get the dynamic content, you need really high modes). Thus, using Missing Mass effect is ideal in this case since those very high frequency modes (outside of frequency range of interest) would be computationally expensive to extract, but without them, we’re missing 25% of the mass of the system in the modal content. If one is still unsure, use more modes and see if the response in the response spectrum analysis changes significantly.

Introducing Ansys Electronics Desktop on Ansys Cloud
The Watch & Learn video article provides an overview of cloud computing from Electronics Desktop and details the product licenses and subscriptions to ANSYS Cloud Service that are...
How to Create a Reflector for a Center HighMounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL)
This video article demonstrates how to create a reflector for a center highmounted stop lamp. Optical Part design in Ansys SPEOS enables the design and validation of multiple...
Introducing the GEKO Turbulence Model in Ansys Fluent
The GEKO (GEneralized KOmega) turbulence model offers a flexible, robust, generalpurpose approach to RANS turbulence modeling. Introducing 2 videos: Part 1 provides background information on the model and a...
Postprocessing on Ansys EnSight
This video demonstrates exporting data from Fluent in EnSight Case Gold format, and it reviews the basic postprocessing capabilities of EnSight.
 Why is damped frequency is lower than undamped frequency with viscous damping but larger with structural damping?
 How can I specify acceleration at a node? Could I use the ‘big mass method’?
 How can I change the normalization method of the vibration modes from modal analysis?
 In Workbench Mechanical, how can I obtain strain energy output for Modal analysis?
 Is it possible to perform a sineonrandom vibration analysis in either Mechanical or Mechanical APDL?
 ANSYS Mechanical: Vibration Housing Noise
 In a Modal Analysis of Mechanical, why aren’t the Participation Factors Summary under Solution Information displayed?
 How to apply applicationbased settings to improve the performance and robustness of transient structural analyses?
 How to define variable thickness shell elements in ANSYS Mechanical? Is there any verification example of the variable thickness shell modal analysis available?
 Why does the prestress from Static analysis does not add up to the stress in Random Vibration analysis?
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.