In harmonic response and transient, if it is a rigid wall type of BC, one need not to do anything to specify BC because it’s a natural BC in acoustic. But in Acoustic Modal analysis,does one have to specify it as a “constant pressure”?
Tagged: 19.2, acoustics, mechanical, structural-dynamics, structural-mechanics
January 25, 2023 at 7:34 amFAQParticipant
In modal analyses, the naturally-occurring boundary condition is a rigid wall, which is the same for harmonic or transient analyses as well. There is one exception for handling boundary conditions – in modal analyses, special care has to be taken when one has an anechoic termination or open condition. Let’s say one has a pipe with one end open (say one is looking into something similar to this case): http://labman.phys.utk.edu/phys221core/modules/m12/Standing%20sound%20waves.html In the figures for the section “Tubes with one open and one closed end” above, we see that there is a ‘node’ (vs. antinode) on the left, which represents a rigid wall. The other end is open. In this case, if one constrain pressure=0 on the left (which is actually a rigid wall), one will get the frequencies for this case. The reason why this works is because, in a modal analysis, we are solving for frequencies, so by applying a boundary condition such that we are constraining a ‘node’ (vs. antinode), we are solving for those specific frequencies. Normally, we would not do this, but one can think of it as solving for a specific set of frequencies by imposing a known ‘node’ (vs. antinode). One can solve this same situation without imposing a boundary condition, but would need to model the air around the pipe as well. If one does so, they can solve for the same frequencies, but it will require longer computational time since they are modeling the air around the pipe as well – also, one may get other non-pipe modes included in your solution. Thus, constraining the closed end to pressure=0 to enforce a ‘node’ (vs. antinode) is a simpler approach. This does not mean that one set pressure=0 for a rigid wall. Instead, think of it as enforcing a ‘node’ (vs. antinode) in a specific location.
Introducing Ansys Electronics Desktop on Ansys Cloud
The Watch & Learn video article provides an overview of cloud computing from Electronics Desktop and details the product licenses and subscriptions to ANSYS Cloud Service that are...
How to Create a Reflector for a Center High-Mounted Stop Lamp (CHMSL)
This video article demonstrates how to create a reflector for a center high-mounted stop lamp. Optical Part design in Ansys SPEOS enables the design and validation of multiple...
Introducing the GEKO Turbulence Model in Ansys Fluent
The GEKO (GEneralized K-Omega) turbulence model offers a flexible, robust, general-purpose approach to RANS turbulence modeling. Introducing 2 videos: Part 1 provides background information on the model and a...
Postprocessing on Ansys EnSight
This video demonstrates exporting data from Fluent in EnSight Case Gold format, and it reviews the basic postprocessing capabilities of EnSight.
- The warning message is: “The maximum contact stiffness is too big. This may affect the accuracy of the results.” Why does large contact stiffness affect results accuracy?
- Contact Definitions in ANSYS Workbench Mechanical
- After Workbench crashes, how can I recover the project from a .mechdb file?
- Model has a large number of contacts – how to reduce them?
- How to resolve “Error: Invalid Geometry”?
- How to display the color of each body based on the material in Mechanical?
- How to deal with “”Problem terminated — energy error too large””?”
- The LS-DYNA equivalent of *MODEL_CHANGE card (in ABAQUS). Which keywords can be used to introduce(activate)/delete(deactivate) elements in the middle of a calculation (at user-specific time/load steps).
- Please explain the warning message “coefficient ratio exceeds 10e8” ?
- How to locate an element of a particular ID number in Mechanical?
© 2023 Copyright ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved.